Monday, January 28, 2013

Polls and Democracy



Polls and Democracy
            In any country with full democracy the governments and political spend huge amounts of money on opinion polls. The surveys are a vehicle for express opinions, ideas and concerns of population for a specific topic. Recognizing that the survey results are of vital importance to politicians. It is imperative to analyze the form or methodology used in the survey. Because depending on the method and responsibility of the surveyor we can get real data. So how we can do a survey technically valid? To accomplish this goal we have roadmap that allows properly the elaboration of a survey: Set the Sample Size. Sample Quality. Fieldwork / Classification. Laboratory. Publication and Conclusion. It is important to follow these steps in order to work successfully and to obtain reliable results that allow making wise decisions.
            Set the Sample Size: At this point we should work with approximately 10% of the electorate. Working with a larger sample could be recommended but is expensive. Anyway, there are statistical methods for work efficiently with a sample of this size. The collection of this information must be made between citizens eligible to vote.
            Sample Quality: When determining the sample size. Proceed to determine its characteristics and quality. This part is chosen at random to survey participants. Shouldn’t predetermine any of the respondents. This process should be transparent. Because otherwise you lose objectivity. For example: Imagine a sample where 80% of respondents are chosen in advance, with the same political tendency. This result is obviously altered and never be objective. The interviewer should work with random samples to make sure that his work is based on a representative sample.
            Fieldwork / Classification: At this point it specifies the ways of collect and processing data. If decide to place on the street interviewers should establish schedules and sites for example: In the subway, shopping’s and parks during rush hour. And if the survey is done by telephone also set times and dates. Once the information in our bureau we proceed to organize the data by age, sex, ethnic group, education etc.
            Laboratory: This is where we started to apply statistical models that give reliable results (rate of up to 97% success rate). To run the models we have to do some preliminary calculations such as: Sample mean, mode, median and standard deviation. Once done proceed to make our table data and can create some charts. All these models are based on sophisticated mathematical calculations that allow us to reach concrete results.
            Publication: Here we discuss the results with the politician or his advisers.  And if the survey is not for private use can be published in the media. Usually at this point are given recommendations or suggestions to the political. Depending on how this popularity. And finally we can set when is the next measurement and if he wants to add more details to study.
            Conclusions: For the statistics is very important to work with professional thoroughness. Because events can occur as seen in the years 1936 and 1948. Specifically in 1936 the pollsters gave the winner the governor Alf Landon (with a ratio 4 to 1) Vs. President Roosevelt. And the end result was totally different. President Roosevelt won with over 60% of the vote.
            In 1948, three well-known pollsters: Roper, Crossley and Gallup conducted the same wrong prediction: predicted that Thomas Dewey would defeat Harry Truman and become president of the United States. This error would not have been so shocking if one month before the election, pollsters had not decided not to conduct more surveys because they were convinced that Thomas Dewey would win the election. History reminds us that Harry Truman ended up winning the presidential elections of 1948. Not surprisingly, Truman enjoys to criticize the newspapers, so sure of their defeat, they printed the wrong headline Dewey defeats Truman.
The surveyors of the time they were astonished. And it took years for people to trust the surveys. The government even threatened to regulate the sector surveys. The surveyors took careful note of what not to do, following the colossal mistake. And since 1948, most of the best known pollsters have successfully predicted the outcome of U.S. presidential elections.